document,

We do not have any documents for this person yet. Should we? Write and tell us who this person is and what makes them interesting. hans.brough@yahoo.com

Filters

New York, 29 August, 1790.

Sir,

That New Orleans and the Spanish posts on the Mississippi will be among the fiirst attempts of the English, in case of a war with Spain, appears very probable ; and that a combined operation from Detroit would be convenient to that end, cannot be doubted. The consequences on the western settlements, on the commerce with the West Indies, and on the General security and tranquillity of the American Confederation, of having them in our rear and on both our flanks, with their navy - in front, are very obvious.

The interest of the United States duly weighed, and their duty conscientiously considered, point out to them, in the case of such a war, a neutrality, as long as it may be practicable. The people of these States would not willingly support a war, and the present Government has not strength to command, nor enough of the general confidence of the nation to draw, the men or money necessary, until the grounds, causes, and necessity of it should become generally known and universally approved. A pacific character, in opposition to a warlike temper, a spirit of conquest, or a disposition to military enterprise, is of great importance to us to preserve, in Europe ; and therefore we should not engage, even in defensive war, until the necessity of it should become apparent, or, at least, until we have it in our power to make it manifest in Europe as well as at home.

la order to preserve an honest neutrality, or even the reputation of a disposition to it, the United States must avoid, as much as possible, every real wrong, and even every appearance of injury to either party. To grant to Lord Dorchester, in case he should request it, permission to march troops through the territory of the United States, from Detroit to the Mississippi, would not only have an appearance, offensive to the Spaniards, of partiality to the English, but would be a real injury to Spain. The answer, therefore, to his Lordship, should be a refusal, in terms clear and decided, but guarded and dignified ; in a manner which no person has more at command than the President of the United States.

If a measure so daring, offensive, and hostile, as the march of troops through our territory, to attack a friend, should be hazarded by the English, without leave, or especially after a refusal, it is not so easy to answer the question, what notice ought to be taken of it.

The situation of our country is not like that of most of the nations in Europe. They have, generally, large numbers of inhabitants in narrow territories. We have small numbers, scattered over vast regions. The country through which the Britons must pass, from Detroit to the Mississippi, is, I suppose, so thinly inhabited, and at such a distance from all the populous settlements, that it would be impossible for the President of the United States to collect militia or march troops sufficient to resist the enterprise. After the step shall have been taken, there are but two ways for us to proceed ; one is war, and the other, negotiation. Spain would probably remonstrate to the President of the United States ; but whether she should or not, the President of the United States should remonstrate to the King of Great Britain. It would not be expected, I suppose, by our friends or enemies, that the United States should declare war at once. Nations are not obliged to declare war for every injury, or even hostility. A tacit acquiescence, under such an outrage, would be misinterpreted on all hands ; by Spain, as inimical to her, and by Britain, as the effect of weakness, disunion, and pusillanimity. Negotiation, then, is the only other alternative.

Negotiation, in the present state of things, is attended with peculiar difficulties. As the King of Great Britain twice proposed to the United States an exchange of Ministers, once through Mr. Hartley, and once through the Duke of Dorset, and when the United States agreed to the proposition, flew from it ; to send a Minister again to St. James's, till that Court explicitly promises to send one to America, is a humiliation to which the United States ought never to submit. A remonstrance, from Sovereign to Sovereign, cannot be sent but by an Ambassador of some order or other; from Minister of State to Minister of State, it might be transmitted in many other ways. A remonstrance, in the form of a letter from the American Minister of State to the Duke of Leeds, or whoever may be Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, might be transmitted through an Envoy, Minister Plenipotentiary, or Ambassador of the President of the United States at Paris, Madrid, or the Hague, and through the British Ambassador at either of those Courts. The utmost length that can be now gone, with dignity, would be to send a Minister to the Court of London, with instructions to present his credentials, demand an audience, make his remonstrance ; but to make no establishment, and demand his audience of leave, and quit the kingdom in one, two, or three months, if a Minister of equal degree were not appointed, and actually sent, to the President of the United States from the King of Great Britain.

It is a misfortune that, in these critical moments and circumstances, the United States have not a Minister of large views, mature age, information, and judgment, and strict integrity, at the Courts of France, Spain, London, and the Hague. Early and authentic intelligence from those Courts may be of more importance than the expense ; but, as the Representatives of the people, as well as of the Legislatures, are of a different opinion, they have made a very scanty provision for but a part of such a system. As it is, God knows where the men are to be found who are qualified for such missions, and would undertake them. By an experience of ten years, which made me too unhappy at the time to be ever forgotten, I know that every artifice which can deceive, every temptation which can operate on hope or fear, ambition or avarice, pride or vanity, the love of society, pleasure, or amusement, will be employed to divert and warp them from the true line of their duty, and the impartial honor and interest of their country.

To the superior lights and information derived from office, the more serene temper and profound judgment of the President of the United States, these crude and hasty thoughts concerning the points proposed, are humbly submitted, with every sentiment of respect and sincere attachment, by his

Most obedient and most humble servant,

John Adams.

Author:

Source: